Infrequently updated consistently funny

Thursday, June 02, 2005

MJ trial

So the Jury is supposed to be getting the Michael Jackson case tomorrow. I wonder how quickly a verdict will be rendered and what it will be? Any guesses?

2 comments:

Kelly said...

I am going with "Not Guilty." I don't think there is enough concrete evidence for a jury to find him guilty. Especially considering the shadiness of the mother. I, however, do think he is guilty as sin and chooses his "victims" carefully. While he is crazy, he isn't crazy enough to try it with a kid from an upstanding family. Of course he won't molest a child star. He wouldn't be able to discredit them. But some litigious nobody from a trailer park in Arkansas? Easy pickings.

Maria Elisa said...

Not guilty.

Blog Archive

About Me

My photo
Cali-J ueber alles in der Welt. Some think that I am mean; (I call them friends), in fact I am not that mean. What I am is sarcastic and dry to the sandpaper level. I have friends that I have never said a kind word to their face, but I praise to the ends of the earth to anyone I know and will defend them to the end. That’s just how I roll! My boys know that I am down for them, my girls know that no matter what I will keep them safe (and occasionally flirt with them [If you are a female friend of mine and think I haven’t flirted with you it just means you didn’t notice, it was extremely subtle or…not yet ]). No one is safe from my sarcasm even my own parents; hence of course as a kid I spent a significant amount of time in punishment. I treat people with respect if I think they deserve it – everyone starts off with the same amount of respect from me (a lot). You don’t need to earn my respect; you have to keep my respect.